Liverpool enjoyed a successful domestic season as they won the league for the 20th time and the second time in five years.
Arne Slot’s side as it were endured two massacres in 34 diversions, appearing extraordinary consistency as they won the Chief Alliance with four recreations to save
With the season presently over, Liverpool have as of now begun planning for the modern season, trusting to construct on their victory.
The marking of Jeremie Frimpong was reported by Liverpool on Friday. They are moreover in talks with Bournemouth left-back Milos Kerkez, whereas the Reds are top picks to arrive Florian Wirtz in a record-breaking bargain.
In terms of outgoings, they have as of now misplaced Trent Alexander-Arnold to Genuine Madrid for £8.5m and they presently confront intrigued in other key players counting Luis Diaz.
Saudi monsters Al-Nassr make Liverpool’s Luis Diaz their best target
Luis Diaz is supposedly Al Nassr’s best summer target, with the Saudi club planning a £72m offered, concurring to legitimate writer, Ben Jacobs. Concurring to him, such an offer might entice Liverpool to offer him.
Barcelona are too fascinated by Diaz, but it remains to be seen whether they can manage to finance the bargain
Ought to Diaz take off, Jacobs accepts Liverpool are anticipated to seek after a huge substitution, with Anthony Gordon as of now on their radar. Talking on talkSPORT, Jacobs said:
“Al Nassr need Luis Diaz. They will see at Garnacho on the off chance that they do not get Diaz but my understanding is that Diaz is the best target.
“The advantage for Liverpool is they will have bounty of cash to spend (in the event that sold to Saudi). So on the off chance that Diaz goes, I would anticipate a huge substitution. We know they like Anthony Gordon, for case. Diaz to Al-Nassr could be a concrete plausibility.
“Diaz posted a message that was fundamentally fair an end-of-season thank you. But a few Liverpool fans possibly felt that there was an component of farewell perusing between the lines.
“Al-Nassr need Luis Diaz. He’s their beat target. They accept €85m (£72m) will be great sufficient. And I do think at that number Liverpool could be enticed to offer. So that’s one to observe.
“But Barcelona and Diaz as well. So he’s getting to have a huge choice to form on the off chance that Barcelona can discover a way to finance it. But clearly Liverpool would favor on the off chance that they’re progressing to offer to sell to Al-Nassr since that’s the as it were way they’re getting to get this number of €85m (£72m).”
Luis Diaz has demonstrated to be a awesome marking for Liverpool
Diaz joined Liverpool from Porto in January 2022 for £37m and made an quick affect, making a difference the club win the FA Container and the Association Container, whereas moreover coming to the Champions Alliance last in his make a big appearance season with the Reds.
Since joining, he has made 148 appearances for the club, scoring 41 objectives and helping 23 over all competitions.
This past season was his individual best at Anfield, scoring 17 objectives and helping eight in 50 diversions over all competitions
Diaz has set up himself as a fan top pick at the club with his energizing hostile football and work rate. Fans will not like him to be sold unless there’s an well-suited substitution lined up.
Comparing Luis Diaz with Newcastle star Anthony Gordon
Gordon has been an powerful player for Eddie Howe’s Newcastle group since his move from Everton in 2023.
He has made 106 appearances for the club since, scoring 22 and helping 23 over all competitions. This season, he made 42 appearances, scoring nine objectives and helped seven.
Comparing Diaz to Gordon, the Colombian leads in most key measurements from this past season
He brags the next non-penalty anticipated objectives per 90 (0.45 vs. 0.24) and superior shooting stats, with 42.3% shots on target and 2.66 shots per 90 versus Gordon’s 28.1% and 2.11.
Gordon somewhat outflanks Diaz in anticipated helps per 90 (0.19 vs. 0.17), but Díaz has more key passes (2.10 vs. 1.89) and higher shot-creating (4.39 vs. 3.74) and goal-creating activities (0.60 vs. 0.44