Stadium redevelopment is the new frontline in the financial cold war between Premier League clubs and, as is customary for Liverpool’s owners, FSG have long been ahead of the curve at Anfield
Liverpool’s matchday income is the most modest of their three revenue streams, with their commercial operation and centrally negotiated media deals making up about 80 per cent of their £614m turnover.
But the cash they earn through the turnstiles is growing – and fast. Even last season, when they had no Champions League football and its associated ticketing opportunities, it increased by £22m
Whether that’s good or bad depends on which side of the ledger you sit. And this dichotomy cuts through to the heart of the central debate in modern football finance: fan culture vs consumerism.
For Liverpool fans, the upwards trend in the cost of supporting their team is worrying, though the club have to their credit frozen general admission and season ticket prices for 2025-26
But as far as Fenway Sports Group (FSG) are concerned, the resistance to rising prices is a major headache. In the past, John Henry has explicitly said as much
They’d love nothing more than to turn Anfield into a Disney Land-style experience, trading on Liverpool’s IP to extract maximum value from more lucrative demographics than the club’s bedrock support.
That’s why pressure from supporter groups like Spirit of Shankly, who orchestrate the official Supporter Board set up in the aftermath of the FSG-minded European Super League, is so valuable
This system of checks and balances is far from unique to Liverpool, but their status as one of the Premier League’s two biggest exports, alongside Manchester United, means its arguably more pronounced
There is, however, a trade-off which comes in tow with supporting one of the world’s most famous clubs, especially one with the self-funding model favoured by the owners five time zones away in Boston.
To keep up with inflation in the transfer ecosystem – as well as the wage market, as Liverpool have witnessed first-hand in Trent Alexander-Arnold’s contract psychodrama – revenues need to rise every year.
The Reds haven’t hit a ceiling with matchday income yet. They will realise the full financial benefits of the expanded Main Stand and Anfield Road Stand over the next few seasons.
But after that, there will be an inflection point as Henry, Tom Werner and their colleagues in the FSG hierarchy look to keep pace with a growing contingent of clubs with shiny new stadiums.
Man United are seemingly destined for Europe’s biggest and most lucrative arena, following in the footsteps of Tottenham with their move to a new money-printing stadium in 2019.
Man City are in the process of expanding, while Arsenal and Chelsea are set to embark on their own stadium projects in the next few years too
Looking outside the so-called Big Six, Liverpool see uber-ambitious clubs in their rear view, backed by sovereign wealth or private equity funds for whom stadium expansion is the next step in the masterplan.
The likes of Aston Villa and Newcastle won’t catch the Merseysiders in this category. At least, not any time soon. But they will loosen the knots of the financial safety net Liverpool have enjoyed in the modern era.
So how do Fenway protect their position without alienating the traditional support who generate the atmosphere and culture that made the club such an attractive investment prospect in the first place
Commercial income – that’s revenue from sponsorship, merchandise and events – has less of a defined ceiling than matchday but it’s a saturated market. And the tide is rising across the Premier League
It’s hard to gain an outsized competitive advantage from media and TV rights too given that they are engineered at the Premier League and UEFA’s HQs, not at FSG’s offices in Boston or on Merseyside.
That’s why, despite the fact that bricks-and-mortar redevelopment is phenomenally expensive, matchday income is seen as the golden goose in football, and the space race is on to capitalise.
So what options are available to Liverpool?
They could surely satisfy higher demand for tickets – but is another expansion feasible, affordable, and cost-effective? And if not, how will Anfield continue to up the ante financially
Liverpool won’t expand Anfield – but there could be big changes
The idea of another expansion has been floated often in recent month in light of events in Manchester, but this week it emerged that Liverpool have not revised their stance on increasing capacity at Anfield
However, while the number of seats might not change, the cash generative power of the stadium may well.
Clubs are increasingly looking to hospitality and retail to push the envelope. And on that note, Liverpool announced yesterday that they have submitted an application to refurbish their on-site megastore
However, the real value might lie not with increased merchandise sales on matchdays but what Liverpool can do with their stadium when it isn’t in use by Arne Slot’s side.
Three Taylor Swift gigs last summer generated eight figures for Liverpool, while Bruce Springsteen, Lana Del Rey and
Dua Lipa – an act with whom fans have an unlikely affinity – will play the stadium this June