Ange Postecoglou defended Stuart Attwell’s debatable selection now no longer to problem a 2d reserving to Lucas Bergvall at some stage in the lead- as much as his aim on Wednesday night. But a VAR professional has clarified that Liverpool had each proper to be livid approximately the failure to disregard the goalscorer. The Swedish youngster’s decisive strike withinside the 86th minute secured Tottenham’s 1- zero victory withinside the first leg of the Carabao Cup semi-final.Reds boss Arne Slot become livid at the touchline while Bergvall, already booked, scythed down Kostas Tsimikas withinside the build- as much as the aim however prevented similarly punishment. Earlier,
the 18-year- vintage were booked for a sliding undertaking on Luis Diaz, aleven though replays confirmed minimum contact. Tsimikas, sidelined watching for his return, become absent at some stage in the decisive play, deepening Liverpool’s frustration as a member of the dugout acquired a reserving for the response instead.
“No, he wasn’t. No, he wasn’t!” the supervisor of the other dugout informed Sky Sports while requested if Bergvall become fortunate to be at the pitch. “People misread my remarks from the alternative day. The rule is, and we have got been informed for pretty some time now, that if gain receives performed , as lengthy because it ‘s now no longer a cynical tackle, it is now no longer a yellow card.” Watch the clip belowDale Johnson, who works for ESPN as an editor and VAR professional , published on X withinside the aftermath of final night’s suit to provide his personal view of the drama. “That ought to were a 2d yellow for Lucas Bergvall,” he said. Before adding ( click on at the submit beneath to peer the whole thread):
“It wasn’t an try and prevent a promising assault , which would not bring about a warning if the pass performs out. It become a reckless tackle, and ought to were a reserving irrespective of the attackAnge Postecoglu is wrong for 3 reasons,” Johnson continued, relating to the Tottenham supervisor ‘s dissection of the rulebook. “1. Bergvall’s offence is a reckless tackle, now no longer preventing a promising assault 2. Advantage isn’t always implemented on a 2d yellow until it is an IMMEDIATE aim risk 3. Ref failed to play gain . Said no foul.
“Ange is accurate that there is no yellow for preventing a promising assault (SPA) if the ref performs gain and the assault performs out. But the regulation would not permit Stuart Attwell to play gain , despite the fact that he did view Bergvall’s undertaking as SPA. Play should prevent and 2d yellow shown.”When the undertaking is made via way of means of Bergvall, referee Stuart Attwell seems to factor on the ball to signify the Tottenham participant gained it. There did now no longer seem like any indication of gain being performed , which he should not do besides for the second one yellow. If the referee informed the managers he performed gain and failed to display the yellow because it become preventing a promising assault , he is nonetheless admitting to an error.